Bombastic Art: Manifest Destiny and John Gast’s American Progress

Since I am neither an art critic nor an art historian, I tend to gravitate toward paintings that are easy to interpret.  For our course on the national parks, one of my favorite examples of low hanging interpretative fruit is John Gast’s American Progress (1872).  This painting is one of our best examples of how attitudes toward landscape representation in America changed as the nation rifled on toward a highly industrialized state in the late nineteenth century.

We will talk a lot about the ideologies that are wrapped up in the preservation of “natural” spaces in the national parks this semester.  Perhaps no single ideology is more problematic than the doctrine of manifest destiny, or a sense that the teleology of America’s development as a nation is westward expansion and removal of Indian populations.  The inevitability of American Manifest Destiny seems to be the message of American Progress, and it provides a context for the development of our national parks.

John Gast, American Progress (c. 1872)

Compared to earlier examples of American landscape paintings from the early-to-mid nineteenth century, Gast makes no effort to achieve veresimilitude.His painting is a cartoonish conglomeration of the heretofore developed continent, as if it must represent the entire spectrum of a map that spans from the east coast to the Rocky Mountains.

In fact, there is a purpose to the distorted perspective of Gast’s vision, but first, let me mention the obvious elements of the painting.  On the right (the east), you can see what appears, spatially or geographically, to be the Great Lakes, or perhaps Manhattan Island, with bridges and ships surrounding it.  At the center of the painting is a charming, female ambassador of American liberty, and she, like all of the figures in this work, is facing west, to demonstrate the social and scientific progress of American society as settlers moved across the great plains and toward the west coast.

As Richard Grusin explains, American Progress was commissioned by George A. Crofutt, a traveler and speculator who had published his own guide to the American west.  Croffut had a vested financial interest in encouraging the conquest of Native American lands, and he is, then, one of the first people to interpret the painting.  Croffut described the ambassador as a “beautiful and charming female…floating westward through the air, bearing on her forehead the ‘Star of Empire'” (72).  In her hands she holds a book and a coil of electric power line wire, which together represent the intellectual and scientific improvements that result from American westward expansion.

Behind her are three parallel railroad engines, which appear to be heading down tracks that disappear into the landscape.  The message is clear:  westward expansion will allow Americans to accomplish what earlier farmers, pioneers, and speculators had done with much lesser means, but only if the nation commits itself to developing the infrastructure that will make expansion possible.

This painting isn’t exactly subtle.  Gast divides his allegorical landscape into sections that display various stages of American development.  In the bottom left, a man plows a field on a settled homestead, but even he is looking west, toward new possibilities.  While the eastern edge of American Progress is illuminated and clear, the western boundary is dark and foreboding, a common motif artists used to represent the uncertainties of conquest on the wilderness frontier.

Conspicuously absent from this painting is the Native American population.  Of course, one could argue that the figures shrouded in darkness on the right (west) are Indians, but they are running, along with the buffalo-looking blobs, away from the advancing progress.  This representation certainly whitewashes their departure and leaves unanswered the question of where they will go when all of the land has been taken.

Gast’s American Progress is sheer propaganda for American conquest of the frontier, yet it’s not unlike other paintings of its time.  Another example is a lithograph by Fanny Palmer called “Across the Continent, Westward Course of Empire Takes Its Way” (1868).

 What these two works have in common is a distortion of perspective (literally and figuratively).  They each seem to say that the elements of American civilization, the electrical power line and the railroad, can produce a smaller, more connected world.  Thus begins a fantasy of dominance and connectivity that persists in the United States even today.

We cannot ignore the representations of nature in American Progress, when we think about the preservation of America’s national parks.  In their own ways, the parks and the painting are representations of an idea, just as much as they are records of a real physical space or experience.


8 thoughts on “Bombastic Art: Manifest Destiny and John Gast’s American Progress

  1. These are great paintings to talk about as we introduce this class. Although they are relatively simple images they are densely packed with all sorts of ideas, many of which now conflict with our own ideas today. For example, in the 19th century, clear cutting forests, industrializing the landscape, and pushing indigenous peoples off their lands were considered good things and in the best interests of American society. Were certainly not so supportive of these ideas today.

    Also, I really liked your reference to a literal and figurative distortion of perspective — that’s very insightful.

  2. I beleive your interpratations are not accurate, about depictions in all the paintings I have seen. Case in point- Especially the John Gast Painting,- The Westward Movement. Either the prnter or Richard Crusin , do not know their left from their right hand, and it is NOT an electric wire Miss Liberty is stringing out behind her. The Book is NOT a common school book !There are MANY wrong interpratations connecting to the painting I know ALL of the correct ones. John T. Rinkes

  3. I ask, Who is Rachel Norman as of May 12th 2015 ? Today is June 25th -2015 I apologize for not checking this comment section . Yes, I can explain all of the right interpretations . They were explained to John Gast’s Sister, my Grandmother on my Mother’s side. WHERE he painted the depiction,[ The Westward Movement,] was near Oregon City ,Oregon. My grandmother said I could ride my horse to the exact place. Knowing WHERE he was when he painted the picture, would make perfect sense to anyone sitting where he was. EVERY depiction is right where it belongs. I think I counted 14 or 16 depictions that can be where they SHOULD BE! There are other explanations in Printed history by the authors, that John Gast read about before he came out West to do the paintings. ONE depiction was written by Dr. John McLoughlin, known as– “The Father of Oregon . To PROVE part of that depiction, I myself, -John T. Rinkes, ADORNED myself with the same LOOKING tool, that is in the painting, and WRONGFULLY explained in many teachings. If anyone would like one– you can BUY one depicted with a true picture– from the web pages. !! Of course the man with it in the painting had been employed by Dr. John, [as he was called by the pioneers, –He was called “The White headed Eagle by the Natives. That man carrying the tool, actually was related to my grandmother. HE is WITH another man who shared their same first names. A HINT– the name is “Jessie” BOTH were accomplished in the same profession. ONE is the son of whose father– in South Carolina,- who instigated building the “Cumberland Gap Road. !. SO– many people KNOW who did that! His initials are D B . and that does NOT mean– D B COOPER! OH– also- two of the men in that same depiction, are brothers and WITH Dr. John, they were BEAR hunting, on Christmas Day, AND going South in search for a likely FERRY LANDING. They did find a perfect place, today called Wilsonville. I married into the family that was the LAST contractor and I owned the Ferry, Respectively, named– ” The Jessie B” NOW do you see WHO those men are in the painting ? THIS is your assignment. OH– also– I hope some of the Ivy league teachers see this and would contact me, so they can SEE the right explanations. ALL I know is printed somewhere, and they can help FIND it ! So– Rachel– Lets get started !—- John T. Rinkes– and– I am around other sites too.

  4. John T. Rinkes here- Is there anyone willing to reply about the John Gast painting ? How about Martha Sandwiest ,in New Mexico ? Where are you? I want to grade your papers . Please turn them in THIS Semester ! ———- John T. Rinkes Waiting —

  5. Today- Nov. 13th 2015 STILL no replies . Where is Martha Sandwiest ? Is she still in New Mexico? I see no Proof to pass her in this semester. Only a hand written note can save her credits .John T. Rinkes is a proven psychic , who , as we ALL did, came from “SPACE” the FINAL frontier.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s